NVIDIA's GeForce GTX 465: Cheaper Isn’t Always Better
by Ryan Smith on May 31, 2010 3:26 AM ESTHAWX
Ubisoft’s aerial action game is one of the less demanding games in our benchmark suite, particularly for the latest generation of cards. However it’s fairly unique in that it’s one of the few flying games of any kind that comes with a proper benchmark.
Given NVIDIA’s product positioning we weren’t expecting the GTX 465 to take too many leads over the 5850, so when it does it’s noteworthy. Here the GTX 465 starts with a 9% lead at 1680, 2% at 1920, and taking a loss of 9% at 2560. As we see the GTX 470’s lead melt away here when the resolution increases, this points to a likely bottleneck with the ROPs or memory bandwidth, as both would be heavily strained by our higher resolutions. Notably the GTX 470 and GTX 465 once again maintain a consistent relationship: the latter is slower by 16%-18%.
71 Comments
View All Comments
poohbear - Monday, May 31, 2010 - link
Why's the 5770 10fps slower than the 4870? is that a mistake? they perform on par especially w/ the recent driver updates for the 5770.poohbear - Monday, May 31, 2010 - link
in mass effect 2.:p hate the no edit feature!Ryan Smith - Monday, May 31, 2010 - link
There aren't any typos; those are the results we got for those cards on the 10.3a drivers.temps - Monday, May 31, 2010 - link
I can vouch for that. When my 1gb 4870 died, it was replaced with a 5770. In ME2, I saw a 10-15fps drop across the board with the same settings.. that didn't do it for me, so I ended up stepping up to a 5850.BoFox - Tuesday, June 1, 2010 - link
Didn't you know that the 5770 is generally slower than 4870? The 4870 has far, far greater memory bandwidth despite a 100MHz lower core clock.tno - Monday, May 31, 2010 - link
I think a repost to the feed is appropriate when someone goes through this again and polishes it up. I couldn't finish the second paragraph it was so full or mistakes. Really guys there is no shame in hiring a copy editor.softdrinkviking - Tuesday, June 1, 2010 - link
i don't care about typos in this kind of article.aside from problems with the numbers, i think everyone knows what is meant.
i feel like it's expected that tech blog sites are littered with typos.
actually, i'd like to hear about this from ryan smith or somebody here.
do you guys want us to post typo corrections in the comments?
i don't care, but what does anandtech want?
taltamir - Monday, May 31, 2010 - link
According to the graph, the GTX465 gets 89 C not 91 C.
taltamir - Monday, May 31, 2010 - link
nevermind, I see now that there are two graphs, one for furmark and one for crysis.multivac - Monday, May 31, 2010 - link
NVIDIA filled in the first 2 spots in their lineup with the GTX 480 and GTX 480, with obvious room to grow out the family in the future.end of the first paragraph.
still reading but im sure its a great article
cheers!